Here are some examples that contrast ends and means:
Is it worth it to shame and ridicule your kids if they end up getting into a top 5 college?
Is it noble to trash that company on the internet on your way out, if they trashed you while you worked there?
Is it worth it to pocket a bank error in your favor even if you catch it? What if your kids need new sports equipment?
Is a CEO who harasses his reports off the hook if they beat earnings targets consistently?
What if it’s a politician that you know will get people like you a big tax cut?
Is it worth it to work over Christmas and neglect your family if it guarantees that next promotion?
Is it okay to ignore your lonely but annoying neighbor because you really need to unload your groceries?
Is it okay to stir the pot to get more clicks?
Is it passable to make fun of the “weird” person on the team to prevent the others from turning on you?
It is on us to determine whether the ends justify the means.
And to be sure, a lot of great things can be achieved without resorting to immoral or amoral behavior. In fact, most things probably can, though it might take longer and be more difficult.
I can’t compel you or anyone else to take a position on this questions of ends vs. means.
But I do leave you with this radical notion: the ends might not ever justify the means.
If you enjoyed this post, you'll probably like my new book - Character By Choice: Letters on Goodness, Courage, and Becoming Better on Purpose. For more details, visit https://www.neiltambe.com/CharacterByChoice.